Showing posts with label diagnosing infertility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label diagnosing infertility. Show all posts

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Can You Have Too Much Information in Fertility Treatment?


Like many of my patients, my life revolves around information. Personally, I use the same technology as most of you to keep track of obligations and loved ones. Professionally, the Houston Fertility Center team uses technology and constant communication to manage our patients' treatment plans. In this era of digital info, we can all feel more empowered, more often, more quickly. It seems like there's always room for more information, doesn't it?


Is it possible we sometimes actually don't help things with our "more is better" attitude toward information?

It's quite common in my office to hear, "Dr. Kristiansen, we want a baby so badly, we'll submit to any test that exists to find out the problem." I applaud their desire to get to the root of the situation and make it better. For many patients, the "not knowing" is nearly as difficult as not having a baby.

Ironically, even when I have strong reasons to suspect a particular cause of a patient's infertility, some may feel very unsettled if I order only those tests that I know will hone in on that cause. I understand -- they want to cover every single realm of possibility, right up front, leave no stone unturned (so to speak), even if it means performing tests that have a low chance of being applicable in their situation.

Recently, an organization published fact sheets called "Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question," authored by nine medical specialty societies such as the American Academy of Family Physicians and others. The point of this public information campaign: to encourage patient-doctor communication about eliminating unnecessary tests and procedures. The campaign was first started by the National Physicians Alliance and then further supported by the ABIM Foundation with a focus on evidence-based medicine.

There are two recommendations that are pertinent to gynecology:

  1. Don't perform Pap smears on women younger than 21 or who have had a hysterectomy for non-cancer disease.
  2. Don't recommend follow-up imaging for clinically inconsequential adnexal cysts. 


However, there are no similar recommendations specific to fertility treatment.

If you're trying to get pregnant and are worried there may be a problem, here are the tests that I recommend for virtually any fertility patient:


  • Medical history: Not exactly a "test" but a good review of your health and even a little about your immediate family's health history can give us a lot of clues.
  • Semen analysis: It really does take two, so there's almost no point in only looking for infertility causes in half of a couple.
  • Pelvic exam: Even if you've had annual well-woman exams for years, it's possible that something's been missed or that things have changed in terms of your reproductive structure.
  • HSG, unless you're using IVF: Hysterosalpingogram is the best way to determine tubal patency. If there's not a definite plan for in vitro fertilization (which is a very successful workaround for tubal factor infertility), then we need to know the pathway for your eggs is clear.
  • AMH & Day 3 FSH: Simple blood tests, testing these two hormones give us a wealth of information about the quantity and quality of your eggs, for patients of all ages, and enables us to start your treatment plan most appropriately. There's no point being caught by surprise later down the line by an ovarian reserve that was in decline all along.


Of course, there are more diagnostic tools at our disposable if necessary. And that's my point: Simply having a wider array of tests and procedures does not make them all necessary. So why go through the expense of both time and money, not to mention additional anxiety, by submitting to every test -- unless we find, one step at a time, that your initial tests aren't revealing enough information to optimize your treatment path.

Can we have too much information? Not really, especially when it comes to our comfort level. We've all become very accustomed to the sense of control over our lives that comes from having all that data. But there are costs to being inundated with data, both financially and emotionally. Part of my job as a fertility specialist is helping patients find what's necessary and truly helpful from among the abundant but sometimes confusing options.

(Image: Jeroen van Oostrom | FreeDigitalPhoto)

Monday, June 27, 2011

Disney and I Both Hope You Won't Need My Services

The other day I saw a headline that really pulled me in -- "Disney/ABC Television Group Sponsors The American Fertility Association's Infertility Prevention Program".

The combined images of Disney and infertility were curious, indeed. When was the last time you thought about Mickey Mouse and fertility problems at the same time? But that odd juxtaposition is actually the result of positive progress in terms of fertility education.

Truth is, as a mother and physician, I hope you don't need the services of a fertility specialist, now or later. But another truth is explained in this recent blogpost on EmpowHer, "STDs and Infertility", where the author, Stacy Lloyd, explains how some young women are destined for infertility down the road. And it's those facts that make me smile when I read about Disney/ABC TV granting funds to the American Fertility Association (AFA).

The AFA works hard to not just support men and women who are struggling with infertility, but also to educate everyone about the realities of normal fertility. When young people arrive at the point in their lives when having a baby feels like the right thing to do, some are shocked to find that, all along and without their knowledge, their bodies have built up roadblocks against conception. Programs like the AFA's "Infertility Prevention Handbook" and their outreach gatherings at a broad variety of venues (even manicure salons!) can spread the message that steps can be taken before infertility is a fact in someone's life.

Since Disney definitely brings to mind "family", I think it's fitting that the corporation supports efforts at keeping couples from having to consult fertility specialists in the future.

You can find out more about the AFA at their website.

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Your Environment & Your Fertility

A small-scale study, recently published in Fertility & Sterility, adds to what we know about a woman's environment and the quality of her eggs.

In "Serum unconjugated bisphenol A concentrations in women may adversely influence oocyte quality during in vitro fertilization," the study authors conclude that, during IVF cycles, as levels of bisphenol A (BPA) rose, the number of fertilized eggs fell.

There is no simple test for BPA that can be administered in clinics. So, as with many things that may impact fertility, the best advice I can give patients is to try and reduce your exposure to BPA.

This Mayo Clinic article - What is BPA, and what are the concerns about BPA? - offers a quick list of things anyone can do to avoid BPA.


For more on this study:
BPA can affect egg quality, study claims

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Could Your Fertility Problems Be Related to Diet?

May is Celiac Disease Awareness Month, so it's a good time to put the word out about how this rather invisible disease might impact a woman's fertility.

The Celiac Disease Foundation has a list of symptoms that could be considered if you're wondering.

The National Foundation for Celiac Awareness offers excellent primer info on the possible connections between the disease and infertility.

Generally, my fertility-focused advice to people diagnosed with celiac disease would include the recommended dietary changes plus any additional fertility treatments, depending on other factors like the woman's age.